[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Type-error in C code
From: |
Julien Danjou |
Subject: |
Re: Type-error in C code |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:00:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, Nov 12 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> I think we should remove the union Lisp_Object, and instead define a
> struct Lisp_Object { EMACS_INT i; } (reusing the macros of the non-union
> type), and make that the default Lisp_Object at least during
> development.
I can't think of a good reason not to do that. Is there one?
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ <address@hidden> http://julien.danjou.info
- Re: Type-error in C code, (continued)
- Re: Type-error in C code, Miles Bader, 2010/11/12
- Re: Type-error in C code, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/11/12
- Re: Type-error in C code, Jan D., 2010/11/12
- Re: Type-error in C code, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/11/12
- Re: Type-error in C code, Jan Djärv, 2010/11/13
- Re: Type-error in C code, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/11/13
- Re: Type-error in C code, Jan Djärv, 2010/11/13
- Re: Type-error in C code, Johan Bockgård, 2010/11/13
- Re: Type-error in C code, Jan Djärv, 2010/11/14
Re: Type-error in C code, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/13
- Re: Type-error in C code,
Julien Danjou <=
- Re: Type-error in C code, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/15
- Re: Type-error in C code, Julien Danjou, 2010/11/15
- Re: Type-error in C code, Andreas Schwab, 2010/11/15
- Re: Type-error in C code, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/16
- Re: Type-error in C code, Julien Danjou, 2010/11/16
- Re: Type-error in C code, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/16
- Re: Type-error in C code, Julien Danjou, 2010/11/16
- Re: Type-error in C code, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/16
Re: Type-error in C code, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/16