[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3 |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:19:58 +0200 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:52:41 +0200
>
> I often get backtraces that are so truncated that I can't really use
> them for anything. Andreas pointed out that Fbacktrace sets print-level
> to 3:
Can you show an example of this limitation in action? I don't recall
having any problems with Lisp backtraces, they are certainly longer
than 3 levels. Maybe I'm missing something.
- backtrace sets print-level to 3, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/29
- Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/29
- Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/30
- Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/30
- Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/30
- Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/30
- Re: backtrace sets print-level to 3, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/30
- RE: backtrace sets print-level to 3, Drew Adams, 2010/09/30