[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: base
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: base |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:29:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Leo <address@hidden> writes:
> But the minute you publish your screwed-up history to the shared repo,
> you can not escape being caught (in git it will happen as soon as
> someone does a fetch) and as a result you lose the trust of your peer
> developers. The history will then be reset to the correct one (push -f)
> and possibly also an apology for the screwup.
There are situations where it is agreed upon by the developers that a
shared branch is rebased from time to time.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: base, (continued)
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/22
- Re: base, Teemu Likonen, 2010/08/22
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/22
- Re: base, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/23
- Re: base, Leo, 2010/08/23
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/23
- Re: base, Richard Stallman, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Leo, 2010/08/24
- Re: base,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Andreas Schwab, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Leo, 2010/08/24
- Re: base, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/08/24