[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:26:54 -0400 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:52:53 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > If that's indeed the culprit, I think it's a misfeature of Bzr, but at
> > least we can workaround it by using "bzr commit -m <...>", which I would
> > then *strongly* recommend.
>
> Even better: use an unbound branch.
How would this help? No matter what you do in an unbound branch, you
eventually need to push or merge, at which time you will have the same
problem. What am I missing?
- Re: bzr smart server, (continued)
- Re: bzr smart server, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/21
- Re: bzr smart server, Eric Hanchrow, 2010/08/21
- Re: bzr smart server, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/21
- Re: bzr smart server, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/21
- Re: bzr smart server, Lennart Borgman, 2010/08/21
- Re: bzr smart server, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/21
- Re: bzr smart server, Richard Stallman, 2010/08/22
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Miles Bader, 2010/08/20
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Jason Rumney, 2010/08/20
- Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Jan Djärv, 2010/08/20
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Jason Rumney, 2010/08/19
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Jay Belanger, 2010/08/19
Re: Locks on the Bzr repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/19