[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Key bindings proposal
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
RE: Key bindings proposal |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:25:15 +0900 |
Uday S Reddy writes:
> As I mentioned in my previous message, I got fooled because the
> examples I tried all had conflicts.
>
> I went to a dired buffer and tried [...]
Aha. I see what's happening here; that's stunningly bad, or at least
unfortunate, design. It's now issue725, and offtopic for this list.
Reply-To set to xemacs-beta. (Not that I expect any, but just in case.)
- Re: Key bindings proposal, (continued)
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Richard Stallman, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/05
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/04
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/04
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Jason Rumney, 2010/08/04
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/04
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/04
- RE: Key bindings proposal,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/04
- Re: Key bindings proposal, joakim, 2010/08/04
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Stefan Monnier, 2010/08/05
RE: Key bindings proposal, MON KEY, 2010/08/03
Re: Key bindings proposal, MON KEY, 2010/08/03
Re: Key bindings proposal, Xah Lee, 2010/08/13
Re: Key bindings proposal, grischka, 2010/08/13