Re: Comment on Emacs Lisp Introduction

[Harald Hanche-Olsen]

+ David Kastrup <address@hidden>:

> Distributing Emacs without corresponding source to the byte code is a
> violation of its license.

Is it? I thought you only had to offer access to the source code.
Section 6 of the GPL lists a number of ways to do this. But I would
agree that giving people a runnable emacs without lisp/*.el[.gz] is at
least in bad taste.

- Harald