[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope
From: |
Chad Brown |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:01:53 -0700 |
On Jul 16, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Jeff Clough wrote:
> I think you have over-generalized what I was asking for.
While I do feel your pain, and share it to some degree, I expect emacs to
continue to offer settings for such things based on features, rather than
versions or `some point in time'. If you find that this takes up too much
space in .emacs for you, it shouldn't be hard to put together an elisp package
that contains all of those settings that you think should be disabled for
`compatibility mode'; at that point, it's just a matter of submitting it to
emacs-devel for inclusion (or simply relying on emacswiki.org or the upcoming
package system, for example).
*Chad
- Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Jeff Clough, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Uday S Reddy, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Jeff Clough, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Phil Hagelberg, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Fernando C.V., 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Christoph, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Miles Bader, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Miles Bader, 2010/07/16
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/07/18
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Deniz Dogan, 2010/07/18
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Geoff Gole, 2010/07/18
- Re: Emacs User Friendliness Question/Hope, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/07/18