[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jun 2010 23:58:09 +0200 |
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 21:10:28 +0200
>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
>> >> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:58:39 +0200
>> >> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>> >>
>> >> > The problem I tried to solve was the one you reported at the beginning
>> >> > of this thread: evaluate this:
>> >> >
>> >> > (setq scroll-preserve-screen-position 'always
>> >> > scroll-conservatively most-positive-fixnum
>> >> > scroll-step 0)
>> >> >
>> >> > and then visit window.c and press and hold the <down> arrow key. You
>> >> > said that sometimes you see display being recentered, i.e. you see the
>> >> > cursor near the middle of the window, instead of it being at the last
>> >> > screen line.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Then I am afraid the patch is plain wrong.
>> >
>> > Did you try it?
>>
>> Why do you ask?
>
> Because only by trying and reporting the results you can prove that
> the changes I installed do not fix the problem.
For me this is not about checking if the patch works but more about
convincing you that it does not.
Or, I would be very surprised if it did ;-)
Anyway the easiest way now seems that I take this trouble. I tried to
apply your patch as sent, but I could not get it to work. Maybe you
can just send me that function so I can replace that?
>> It does not at all address the original problem.
>
> I think it does, except that you interpret the ``original problem''
> incorrectly.
Yes, let us see.
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, (continued)
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/20
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/20
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/20
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/20
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/21
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/21
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/21
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/21
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/21
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/21