[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: integer overflow
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: integer overflow |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:04:40 -0500 |
The second that "librep" might be an easier starting point for migrating
the Lisp engine. After all, it was designed to be like Emacs Lisp.
If it only supports something like Emacs Lisp then it is not much of
an advance. Guile supports Scheme and Javascript as well as Emacs Lisp.
- Re: integer overflow, (continued)
- Re: integer overflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/05
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Davis Herring, 2010/03/06
- RE: integer overflow, Drew Adams, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Jay Belanger, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow,
Richard Stallman <=
- Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Chad Brown, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06