[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge conlict?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: merge conlict? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:02:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
> Second, what you propose is quite a bit of work, and not of the trivial
> kind.
I think what Andreas is talking about is not about your temporary local
commits, but rather that before commit your changes into the trunk,
you'll want to rework them into a set of clean logical patches.
My experience is indeed that Bzr helps me keep track of local changes
and work on long-time branches, but usually when it gets time to install
on the trunk, I really port the changes "by hand" rather than just ask
Bzr to merge some (set of) change(s), so that I can clean them up (and
often enough, update&improve them). Many people use "rebase" for that
clean up.
Stefan
- Re: merge conlict?, (continued)
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, David Reitter, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25