[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge conlict?
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: merge conlict? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:31:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
> Please note that it is not a question of bisect or not bisect. It is
> always possible to bisect following the leftmost part of the history (as
> long as people do not get accustomed to push their changes onto trunk
> and break that) and it is possible to re-create the original branch and
> bisect it.
That does not help if the bug is buried in the other part.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: merge conlict?, (continued)
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25