[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: log format for vc-bzr
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: log format for vc-bzr |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:35:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
() Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
() Sat, 09 Jan 2010 10:36:39 +0100
> It sounds like the naming error (in the option) lies with the verb
> "forget", which in the construction "forget X" implies X has already
> happened. If X is from the future, "don't bother to schedule X" is
> better.
But the merge _has_ happend, it just hasn't been comitted yet (which is
always a separate step).
I conceptualize likewise, but something said up-thread gave me the
impression that in bzr terminology the commit delimits the "actual
merging" (or "merge point" or ...).
Regardless, hanging this off "bzr revert" is brain-damaged.
thi
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, (continued)
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/01/09
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/09
- Re: log format for vc-bzr,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Miles Bader, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Daniel Clemente, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Daniel Clemente, 2010/01/08
- Re: log format for vc-bzr, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/09