[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers".
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers". |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2010 10:10:02 -0500 |
> Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:33:50 +0100
> From: Jan Djärv <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> If I modify one file it just shows that as modified. I can't reproduce the
> original error. But it still doesn't show any conflict markers:
>
> % bzr merge
> bzr: ERROR: Working tree "/home/jhd/src/bzr/emacs/fixes/" has uncommitted
> changes (See bzr status).
I see that as well when I have uncommitted changes on a branch, so
it's probably normal. Note that the wiki tells you to "bzr merge"
_before_ you start hacking. But you are right that this issue should
be more explicit; I will edit the wiki (unless someone more
knowledgeable points out where we both are mistaken).
> I kind of expected merge to merge changes without me having to check in into
> the quickfix branch first.
Why do you need that? It is so easy to uncommit on a local branch
that committing there shouldn't be a hard decision. It's not like you
are going to pollute a public repository.
> Is there such a command?
I don't know.
- Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Jan Djärv, 2010/01/03
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Bojan Nikolic, 2010/01/03
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Richard Stallman, 2010/01/03
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Bojan Nikolic, 2010/01/03
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Richard Stallman, 2010/01/04
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/04
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Bojan Nikolic, 2010/01/04
- Re: Bzr document unclear. There is no "conflict markers"., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/03