[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x v i bug
From: |
Matt Mackall |
Subject: |
Re: C-x v i bug |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:38:50 -0600 |
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 11:09 -0800, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> Matt Mackall <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 09:40 -0800, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> > > Matt Mackall <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 07:54 -0800, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> > > > > Martin Geisler <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let's first talk about the original problem that started
> this
> > > > > > > discussion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When a file in a directory that is under mercurial control
> is opened
> > > > > > > in emacs, emacs runs "hg status FILE" so that it knows if
> it's
> > > > > > > registered or not, if it's modified, etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any user settings in .hgrc should be irrelevant to the
> above. Right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Right. Many people use the color extension to get better
> feedback from
> > > > > > 'hg status', but if Emacs sets TERM=dumb, then the extension
> will
> > > > > > disable itself. I'm just mentioning color to say that there
> are useful
> > > > > > extensions out there that modify even basic commands like 'hg
> status'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's desirable that this is as fast as possible, so
> processing .hgrc,
> > > > > > > initializing plugins will just waste time.
> > > > > > > After that emacs will want to know the version number for
> the file, for that
> > > > > > > it runs "hg log -l1 FILE", and parse it from the output.
> > > > > > > Any user settings in .hgrc should be irrelevant for this
> command. Right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Right, and it's even quite important that you disable
> localization (run
> > > > > > hg with LANGUAGE=C in the environment). Otherwise you'll end
> up parsing:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > % hg log -l1 README
> > > > > > ændring: 9586:a41f2840f9c6
> > > > > > bruger: Lee Cantey <address@hidden>
> > > > > > dato: Tue Oct 13 12:27:50 2009 -0700
> > > > > > uddrag: README: revert accidental commit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The user could also very well have installed a different
> default style
> > > > > > by setting ui.style. On the command line it's done line this:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you, this was very useful in taking care of some issues in
> emacs.
> > > > >
> > > > > > % hg log -l1 README --style=compact
> > > > > > 9586 a41f2840f9c6 2009-10-13 12:27 -0700 lcantey
> > > > > > README: revert accidental commit
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > [too bad that the status and version number are not
> available from a
> > > > > > > single command...]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, you know, files don't really have a version number with
> modern
> > > > > > version control systems. The entire tree has a version
> number... You can
> > > > > > of course ask about when a file was last touched, but I think
> that
> > > > > > information is getting more and more irrelevant these days.
> > > > >
> > > > > In emacs the generic Version Control layer needs a version number
> in some case.
> > > > > Here's an example from a bug report:
> > > > >
> > > > > cd /tmp
> > > > > mkdir hgtest2
> > > > > cd hgtest2
> > > > > hg init
> > > > > echo foo > foo.txt
> > > > > hg add foo.txt
> > > > > hg commit -m "Added foo.txt"
> > > > > hg branch bar
> > > > > echo bar > foo.txt
> > > > > hg commit -m "Changed foo to bar"
> > > > > hg update -r default
> > > > > echo frobozz > frobozz.txt
> > > > > hg add frobozz.txt
> > > > > hg commit -m "Added frobozz.txt"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > now open the file mkdir /tmp/hgtest2/foo.txt and ask to see the
> > > > > annotated version, emacs does that by running
> > > > >
> > > > > hg annotate -r REVISION foo.txt
> > > > >
> > > > > How can REVISION be obtained in this case?
> > > > > It should be "0", but
> > > > > hg log -l1 foo.txt
> > > > > does not show that...
> > > >
> > > > Version numbers are not per-file in Mercurial. The number you
> should use
> > > > is the global number (or numbers!) reported by hg parents. This
> revision
> > > > is also known as '.', eg 'hg annotate -r . foo.txt'.
> > >
> > > . is not usable in all cases. For the example above:
> > >
> > > hg log -r . foo.txt
> > >
> > > does not work, it does not show anything.
> >
> > I just tested it with the above commands and it works at least as far
> > back as 1.0.
>
> cat foo.txt
> foo
> $ hg parents foo.txt
> changeset: 0:1ac3a9e3757e
> user: address@hidden
> date: Thu Dec 17 08:06:39 2009 -0800
> summary: Added foo.txt
>
> $ hg log foo.txt
> changeset: 1:6d88f588d323
> branch: bar
> user: address@hidden
> date: Thu Dec 17 08:06:39 2009 -0800
> summary: Changed foo to bar
>
> changeset: 0:1ac3a9e3757e
> user: address@hidden
> date: Thu Dec 17 08:06:39 2009 -0800
> summary: Added foo.txt
>
> $ hg log -r . foo.txt
> $ env HGRC= hg log -r . foo.txt
There's no such environment variable. Perhaps you want HGRCPATH.
> $ hg --version
> Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 1.4)
>
> Copyright (C) 2005-2009 Matt Mackall <address@hidden> and others
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
> This is on an up to date Fedora 12 machine.
>
> Is your output different.
Yes. The following script:
#!/bin/sh
rm -rf a
hg init a
cd a
echo foo > foo.txt
hg add foo.txt
hg commit -qm "Added foo.txt"
hg branch -q bar
echo bar > foo.txt
hg commit -qm "Changed foo to bar"
hg update -qr default
echo frobozz > frobozz.txt
hg add frobozz.txt
hg commit -qm "Added frobozz.txt"
hg annotate -r . foo.txt
gives me:
0: foo
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
- Re: C-x v i bug, (continued)
- Re: C-x v i bug, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: C-x v i bug, Martin Geisler, 2009/12/04
- Re: C-x v i bug, Brodie Rao, 2009/12/04
- Re: C-x v i bug, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/04
- Re: C-x v i bug, Martin Geisler, 2009/12/04
- Re: C-x v i bug, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/18
- Re: C-x v i bug, Matt Mackall, 2009/12/18
- Re: C-x v i bug, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/18
- Re: C-x v i bug, Matt Mackall, 2009/12/18
- Re: C-x v i bug, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/18
- Re: C-x v i bug,
Matt Mackall <=
- Re: C-x v i bug, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/12/18
- Re: C-x v i bug, Matt Mackall, 2009/12/18