[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mail mode vs message mode
From: |
Katsumi Yamaoka |
Subject: |
Re: Mail mode vs message mode |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:00:49 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> Chong Yidong wrote:
> How about not synching message.el automatically?
No problem at least to me (I do it manually when I do). Now not
only message.el but also parse-time.el, pgg.el, time-date.el, and
gnus.el differ.
> If message-mode is to become the default mail mode for Emacs, we need to
> be able to make changes to it as part of Emacs. If that can't be done,
> I'd prefer to switch back to mail-mode.
Ok. Maybe the point is that I have no understanding of the goal.
Currently, the default values of message-* variables in question
are the same as those of mail-* variables in the Emacs trunk, and
I find no advantage of message-* variables' succeeding to mail-*
variables' values. But, it is not the goal, is it?
Regards,
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, (continued)
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Miles Bader, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/28
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/27
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/27
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/28
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/29
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode,
Katsumi Yamaoka <=
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/22