[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Displaying bytes
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: Displaying bytes |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:59:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, Nov 25 2009, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Kenichi Handa wrote:
>
>>> If so, should we change the default priorities?
>
>> I'm not sure. As it seems that windows-1252 is a superset of
>> iso-8859-1,
It is, yes.
>> it may be ok to give windows-1252 the higher priority.
>
> Please don't.
>
> I wonder why one would even *think* of changing Emacs's default to a
> Microsoft proprietary "code page". :-(
Just because it has "windows" in its name? IIRC it is registered at
IANA.
>> How do iso-8859-1 users think?
>
> Seems to me that use of iso-8859-* is much more widespread on *nix
> systems.
As far as I understand, an iso-8859-1 user won't notice any
difference. Only if the file is _not_ iso-8859-1 and "fits" in
windows-1252 (e.g. it uses one of the few chars that make the
difference).
We have done something similar (see `mm-charset-override-alist') in
Gnus for displaying mis-labelled articles.
> I think the current default priorities are perfectly fine.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- Re: Fwd: Re: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen., (continued)
- Re: Fwd: Re: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen., Richard Stallman, 2009/11/21
- Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/22
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Richard Stallman, 2009/11/23
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/23
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Richard Stallman, 2009/11/24
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Kenichi Handa, 2009/11/24
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/24
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/24
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/25
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Ulrich Mueller, 2009/11/25
- Re: Displaying bytes,
Reiner Steib <=
- Re: Displaying bytes, Ulrich Mueller, 2009/11/26
- Re: Displaying bytes, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/26
- Re: Displaying bytes, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/26
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/25
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Kenichi Handa, 2009/11/25
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly characters on screen.), Richard Stallman, 2009/11/29
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/29
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly, Juri Linkov, 2009/11/29
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly, tomas, 2009/11/30
- Re: Displaying bytes (was: Inadequate documentation of silly, Andreas Schwab, 2009/11/30