Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs

[Karl Fogel]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> That's true.  Nonetheless, allowing GPLv2 and not GPLv3 is a very bad
> example.  We should not set a bad licensing example.
>
> In addition, I wonder about the other pages in that wiki have a
> similar license.  Are there programs in the wiki which are licensed
> this way, allowing GPLv2 and not GPLv3?
>
> That would be a bad problem.  Can someone tell me if there are any?
>
> Can someone please send me the email address of the people who run
> that site?

Les Harris already sent that name and email address.  Here it is again:

  Alex Schroeder <address@hidden>

More information about him can be found at
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/AlexSchroeder.

-Karl