[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-j considered harmful (not really)
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: C-j considered harmful (not really) |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:57:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Evidently <S-return> is used to insert newlines in lots of programs.
> I've just searched for "shift-return" and "shift-enter" on the web and
> seen many examples.
> After reconsidering this I then suggest just that <S-return> should be
> usable as an alternative to C-j.
So you suggest
(define-key function-key-map [S-return] [?\C-j])
?
I guess I could live with that. But you'd still need to prefix it with
C-q in minibuffer prompts, wouldn't you? So we'd need more changes,
e.g. making LF in minibuffer input not exit the minibuffer. I've never
used an LF key, so I could live with that, but I don't know what other
people think about it.
Stefan
- C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/16
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Deniz Dogan, 2009/11/16
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/17
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/22
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Deniz Dogan, 2009/11/22
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/23
- RE: C-j considered harmful (not really), Drew Adams, 2009/11/23
- RE: C-j considered harmful (not really), Drew Adams, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/24
- RE: C-j considered harmful (not really), Drew Adams, 2009/11/24