Re: Grand Unified Debugger Rewrite's process buffer: comint, eterm or eshell?

[Nick Roberts]

 > Another thing you might want to consider in the design is to allow
 > debugger interaction with simple key bindings from file buffers.  
 > 
 > Now to send commands to the debugger you'd have to use the *gud* buffer,
 > or use complicated key bindings.  
 > Compare to how `edebug' works, the buffer is made read-only, and simple
 > bindings like: n c d  can be used.

This is not such a good idea.  The user migh actuallyt want to edit his source
code during a debug session.

-- 
Nick                                           http://users.snap.net.nz/~nickrob