Re: Supercite and mail-citation-hook

[Glenn Morris]

Ulrich Mueller wrote:

> However, Supercite also doesn't do any QP decoding, which leads to the
> above broken attribution line.
>
> So my question is, who should decode the headers? The MUA (then the
> documentation of mail-citation-hook in sc.texi should be changed or
> clarified), or Supercite (then it's a bug there)?

I haven't thought about it much, but I think the MUA should do any
necessary decoding, since it has to do it anyway to display the
message in the first place. It wouldn't really make sense for SC to
have to do it again. So I would say the documentation should be
changed.