[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BASE_PURESIZE
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: BASE_PURESIZE |
|
Date: |
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:50:22 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> >> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Isn't the current definition of BASE_PURESIZE too large?
>> >>
>> >> Fits quite well here (pure_size - pure_bytes_used == 79770).
>> >
>> > What configuration is that?
>>
>> powerpc-suse-linux
>
> That's strange. Is that a 64-bit system?
No.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- BASE_PURESIZE, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/10/23
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Andreas Schwab, 2009/10/23
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Andreas Schwab, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/25
- defcustom standard-value (was: Re: BASE_PURESIZE), Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/29
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Chong Yidong, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/24
Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/23