[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Package Management
From: |
joakim |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Package Management |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> The rule against using CL functions at run time is for the sake of the
> user. The CL functions are not a standard part of the Emacs Lisp
> namespace. Thus, loading CL can conflict with the user's function
> definitions.
Could we then privide aliases like "cl-loop" for "loop" ?
> Instead of this policy, we could declare those functions standard, but
> I think some of them are not well designed and not good to include.
> Also, to do it right we would need to document these functions in the
> Emacs Lisp manual, which is a big job.
Maybe we could include Cl functions in the Emacs core incrementaly then?
Each CL function moved to the core would require an agreement on the
functions inclusion and a documentation patch.
--
Joakim Verona
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Phil Hagelberg, 2009/09/12
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/12
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/13
- Re: Emacs Package Management,
joakim <=
- Re: Emacs Package Management, David Kastrup, 2009/09/14
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Miles Bader, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Miles Bader, 2009/09/15
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Geoff Gole, 2009/09/16
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/17