Re: CEDET merge question

[Ken Raeburn]

On Sep 6, 2009, at 11:37, Richard Stallman wrote:
>    I ask because the CEDET merge already involves an uncomfortably  
> large
>    amount of code, and it's rather dismaying to see these two big code
>    trees "embedded" in subdirectories of Semantic.  (Wisent, for  
> instance,
>    appears to be an entire Elisp reimplementation of Bison...)
>
> Is it possible to use Bison itself rather than implement the
> same functionality differently?  Or perhaps add an option
> to Bison to output its data in whatever format is convenient?

Guile is also using a translation/reimplementation of Bison in  
Scheme.  I haven't looked at the CEDET code, but Guile's version wants  
the grammar input using Scheme (s-expression) syntax.