[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of IPA patch?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Status of IPA patch? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:17:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> > I don't know why your patch wasn't accepted. Maybe you have no legal
>> > papers, or it's because you need to split it to two steps where the first
>> > step is the conversion to utf-8. Also since all input methods in Emacs
>> > are grouped by their name prefix, the names of new IPA input methods
>> > should be "ipa-kirshenbaum" and "ipa-x-sampa".
>> To make completion harder?
> No, common prefixes make completion easier.
Not necessarily. It makes "shortest unique prefix" longer, so you may
end up having to type more in order to select a particular value.
E.g. compare "C-u C-\ ki RET" to " "C-u C-\ ip-k RET".
>> I’ve signed papers assigning all my Emacs work to GNU; twice, in fact.
>> http://mid.gmane.org/address@hidden and
>> http://mid.gmane.org/address@hidden for the two
>> relevant timeframes. If the two-steps thing was an issue, no-one actually
>> said that, Stefan just asked for clarification about what I was doing.
> Thank you for your efforts. I hope Stefan will decide what to do
> with your patch now.
The problem is that I'm not in a position to judge. If nobody see
a problem with it, feel free to install it.
Stefan
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, (continued)
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28