[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:15:34 +0900 |
Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
>> 15 years ago there were grand plans, but... dunno about now.
>> It's a different world in many ways.
>
> AFAIK, Guile and Scheme as a whole still flourish these days,
There are a huge number of scheme implementations now; even thinking
just about scheme, is guile still competitive?
> and the only serious contender is Clojure that could integrate
> with Emacs the same way as it does with Java.
Why? There are tons of random little languages around now, some very
popular (i.e., javascript), many not so much. Clojure is not scheme, so
why is it any better than those? [Compatibility with the java runtime
is important for some people, but AFAIK, not for Emacs!]
-Miles
--
.Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, (continued)
Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Tom Tromey, 2009/08/26
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/26
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/27
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/27
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/27
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Miles Bader, 2009/08/28
Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Richard Stallman, 2009/08/29
Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/26
Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/08/28