Re: Status of IPA patch?

[Juri Linkov]

>  > I don't know why your patch wasn't accepted. Maybe you have no legal
>  > papers, or it's because you need to split it to two steps where the first
>  > step is the conversion to utf-8. Also since all input methods in Emacs
>  > are grouped by their name prefix, the names of new IPA input methods
>  > should be "ipa-kirshenbaum" and "ipa-x-sampa".
>
> To make completion harder?

No, common prefixes make completion easier.

> I’ve signed papers assigning all my Emacs work to GNU; twice, in fact.
> http://mid.gmane.org/address@hidden and
> http://mid.gmane.org/address@hidden for the two
> relevant timeframes. If the two-steps thing was an issue, no-one actually
> said that, Stefan just asked for clarification about what I was doing.

Thank you for your efforts.  I hope Stefan will decide what to do
with your patch now.

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/