[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of IPA patch?
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Status of IPA patch? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:32:35 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> > The omission of those two was intentional, since U+20A7 is equivalent to tʃ
> > (note that that digraph doesn’t include the tie that would be necessary to
> > have it as a phoneme distinct from /t/ followed by /ʃ/) and g is equivalent
> > to U+0261 for the purposes of the IPA.
I don’t understand why do you omit U+20A7 and U+0261 if they exist in
X-SAMPA and Kirshenbaum?
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/25
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Glenn Morris, 2009/08/25
- Re: Status of IPA patch?,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/27
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Aidan Kehoe, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
- Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28
Re: Status of IPA patch?, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/28