Re: New sync'd branch

[Ken Raeburn]

On Aug 27, 2009, at 00:47, Miles Bader wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > > - the downside of course is that people who want to work on or  
> > > play with
> > >  the Emacs-24 branch will need to learn to use Git.
> > >
> > > How does that sound?
> >
> > Not good at all.  I don't want to waste my scarce time to learn Git,
> > in addition to Bzr.
>
> OTOH, people like that love git -- and I get the impression there are
> quite a few of us here -- would be ecstatic.
>
> I _already_ use git for everyday read-only updates, so the rigamarole
> of having to use other paths to commit things is just annoying...  
> being
> able to commit directly to git would be lovely.

I've been pretty happy with git so far.  But I'm not convinced that  
being able to commit with git for a little while would be all that big  
a benefit if it goes away when the switchover happens.  I would guess  
that at that point emacs-24 would become a bzr branch and the git  
mirror would be read-only?

Is there a good, working, supported git-bzr package that allows you to  
push changes to a bzr repository?  (I've read of at least a couple git- 
bzr packages, but don't know yet if they're supported or any good.)   
If so, it may just be a matter of rebasing local branches from the git  
repo to the bzr one when the time comes, and write access would still  
work.  If that's so, getting the write access sooner does sound  
enticing.

I suppose if bzr can read and write git repositories, that could also  
help; perhaps someone unfamiliar with git could make the jump from CVS  
to bzr now for emacs-24 work, and rebase local work onto "native" bzr  
when the official switchover happens?

Ken