Re: Sending attachments

[Frank Schmitt]

Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:

> Pulling code out of Gnus has the downside that it then needs to be
> inside Emacs, but XEmacs may not have it.  XEmacs compatibility has (as
> long as I can remember) been a Gnus goal.  How should Gnus and Emacs
> deal with this?  I hope "drop XEmacs support" is not an option.

Is XEmacs compatibility really worth the trouble? How many XEmacs users
are still out there?

-- 
Have you ever considered how much text can fit in eighty columns?  Given that a
signature typically contains up to four lines of text, this space allows you to
attach a tremendous amount of valuable information to your messages.  Seize the
opportunity and don't waste your signature on bullshit that nobody cares about.