[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-move-visual
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: line-move-visual |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:46:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Johan Myréen <address@hidden> writes:
> If (2) is the goal then ok, the behaviour of C-n makes sense. But you should
> go all the way and change the behaviour of C-a, C-e, C-k and probably a lot
> of
> other stuff too. You should also get rid of the continuation marks, and make
> the lines wrap at a more sensible place than the right edge of the window.
> Wrapping should also occur at word boundaries.
There are two problems: (1) the inconsistency you are pointing at
between C-n/C-p and C-a/C-e (Tassilo also mentioned this) and (2)
whether `line-move-visual' should default to nil.
Solving (1) would be good, and the two issues are independant.
--
Bastien
- Re: line-move-visual, (continued)
- Re: line-move-visual, Bastien, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Bastien, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Richard Stallman, 2009/07/11
Re: line-move-visual, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Johan Myréen, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Scot Becker, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
- Re: line-move-visual,
Bastien <=
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/11
- Re: line-move-visual, Kenichi Handa, 2009/07/11
- Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/11
Re: line-move-visual, Bastien, 2009/07/11
Re: line-move-visual, Miles Bader, 2009/07/10
Re: line-move-visual, Chong Yidong, 2009/07/10
Re: line-move-visual, Andrey Paramonov, 2009/07/11