Re: moving SCCS later in vc-handled-backends

[tomas]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have to concur with Stephen here. *If* someone is using SCCS with an
odd file managed by RCS, it'd be better having the SCCS commit fail
loudly (and leading the user to investigate the cause) than the RCS
commit failing (nearly) silently, leading possibly to a botched backup
much further down the time line.

Note that I'm no user of RCS, much less of SCCS, so take this with the
appropriate two fists of salt.

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKQdsJBcgs9XrR2kYRAj5NAJ0ewvWKl0czHe0gmTyqArt0LA/zdwCfVVXv
4cFJpAnWV8Vw/cGTd4Ip1T0=
=fku0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----