[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interactive hat.
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Interactive hat. |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:03:08 +0100 |
Hi Alan,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> wrote:
> Agreed, except I wouldn't put it in the command loop - I'd put it in a
> hook (pre-command-hook), for the same reason font-locking is in a hook
> rather than directly in the command loop. M-x shift-select would
> install/remove this function onto/from the hook.
We discussed this before and my conclusion was that this would not
work well enough because of the order of things in the hook would be
crucial. I suggested adding a new hook to run before pre-command-hook.
(And something similar for pos-command-hook.)
- Interactive hat. [Was: CUA-like stuff spuriously enables transient-mark-mode], Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/25
- Re: Interactive hat., Miles Bader, 2009/03/25
- Re: Interactive hat., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/25
- Re: Interactive hat., Miles Bader, 2009/03/25
- Re: Interactive hat., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., David Kastrup, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Stefan Monnier, 2009/03/26
- Re: Interactive hat., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/26