Re: paths are sensative to double separators

[Xavier Maillard]

   Harald Hanche-Olsen <address@hidden> writes:
   > Miles Bader gave a different explanation for emacs's behaviour. It
   > seems odd to me that an interactive feature (a good one, too) should
   > influence how path names are interpreted in code, however.

   I agree with you, but I'm not sure that it's reasonable to change it
   now, given how long Emacs has behaved this way...

I agree with Miles here although the "posix way" should be also
supported (at the user discretion -i.e. via a defcustom).

        Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org