[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: translation-table-for-input
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: translation-table-for-input |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:27:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
> > > I ended up removing the make-obsolete-variable call for
> > > translation-table-for-input, and instead added a blurb to its doc
> > > string to discourage its use for unification purposes.
> > Please don't.
> Too late, it's done.
I know. What I meant was "please revert it".
>> The "obsolete" thingy mostly means "slated for removal", AFAIC. So,
>> yes, it is "obsolete" because I plan to remove it altogether.
> Declaring something obsolete requires that we name which other feature
> to use in its stead. Do we have such an alternative in place?
Just as with make-local-hook, the replacement is to not put anything at
all, because the trasnlation is now automatically done.
>> > Its use for character code unification is obsolete, but otherwise
>> > having a possibility to translate the output of an input method is
>> > a valuable feature.
>> I see no such evidence.
> My evidence is that there's no alternative to translating the output
> of an input method.
That's not an evidence that it's "valuable". The absence of any code
that uses that feature tells me it's not valuable.
Stefan
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/01
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/02
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Richard M Stallman, 2009/02/03
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/12
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/13
- Re: translation-table-for-input,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/13
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/13
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/02/14
- Re: translation-table-for-input, Stefan Monnier, 2009/02/14