[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:00:37 +0100 |
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 22:19, Don Armstrong <address@hidden> wrote:
> They're not "just arbitrary labels".
Packages are not arbitrary labels. "Packages" are. I said that
packages are "packages" (i.e., labels) plus other things.
What I was saying, in other words, is that you can assign a bug to any
arbitrary label, but that the label is not a real package unless the
package exists.
> Bug reports against packages that don't have a maintainer shouldn't be
> submitted, because there's no indication that someone is going to look
> at them. In this case, the error is that no one has asked for the
> rmail package to be created.
But still, you can search for the label "rmail" even if no package exists.
Juanma
- Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Don Armstrong, 2009/01/31
Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail??, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/31