[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest next week
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest next week |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:27:33 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:36:31 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> said:
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:46:29 +0900 From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
>> <address@hidden>
>>
>> I'm really surprised to hear that it hasn't have the top priority.
>> I've been thinking that proper C-g handling is a minimum
>> requirement to be a part of the official Emacs rather than an
>> unofficial distribution.
> What is "improper" in how C-g is handled on Cocoa?
It makes almost all uses of QUIT macro throughout the source code
meaningless.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: Pretest next week, (continued)
- Re: Pretest next week, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/22
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/22
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/24
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/27
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/27
- Re: Pretest next week, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week,
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
- Re: Pretest next week, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/26
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/27
- Re: Pretest next week, Adrian Robert, 2009/01/27
- Re: Pretest next week, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/01/28
Re: Pretest next week, Alex Ott, 2009/01/24
Re: Pretest next week, Bastien, 2009/01/22