[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SI
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:11:23 +0100
> From: grischka <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> > if (gc_in_progress || waiting_for_input)
> > abort ();
> >
>
> Here too.
>
> > Can you see which one of gc_in_progress and waiting_for_input is
> > non-zero?
> >
>
> I'd bet for "waiting_for_input".
Maybe; but I don't think Emacs should wait for input in the middle of
processing. It only does so when it is idle.
> However the problem starts earlier at:
>
> #4 0x081a9a78 in scan_lists (from=8, count=1, depth=-1, sexpflag=0)
> at syntax.c:2805
>
> where it hits the "lose" label.
That just makes it signal an error, which should not cause an abort.
Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM, grischka, 2009/01/23
- Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/23
- Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM, grischka, 2009/01/24
- Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/24
- Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM, grischka, 2009/01/24
- Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/24
- Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM, grischka, 2009/01/24
- Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM, grischka, 2009/01/24