[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug bugs [was Re: ^M in the info files]
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
bug bugs [was Re: ^M in the info files] |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:24:35 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Why won't the tracker get its act together and stop forcing us into
> editing mail headers?
It's been asked for repeatedly, but it doesn't happen. There seems no
point even discussing it, all the points have been made.
I know people shouldn't have to make this effort with headers, but I
was only asking. I'm fed up of duplicate and triplicate mails, and
large numbers of bogus bug reports that need merging.
> I use the Rmail's `r' command, which replies to all the original
> "To" and "CC" addressees.
I don't use rmail, but rmail-dont-reply-to-names ...?
- Re: ^M in the info files, (continued)
RE: ^M in the info files, Drew Adams, 2009/01/10
Re: ^M in the info files, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/12
- Re: ^M in the info files, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/12
- Re: ^M in the info files, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/12
- Re: ^M in the info files, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/12
- bug bugs [was Re: ^M in the info files],
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: bug bugs [was Re: ^M in the info files], Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/13
- Re: bug bugs, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/13
- Re: bug bugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/13
- Re: bug bugs, Chong Yidong, 2009/01/14
- Re: bug bugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/14
- Re: bug bugs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/01/14
Re: bug bugs, Glenn Morris, 2009/01/14