Re: (featurep 'multi-tty) => t on Windows

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:35:33 +0100
> From: "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 00:17, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Can't we test something, instead of a preprocessor define that states
> > an OS?  I'd rather not proliferate abuse of preprocessor for this.
> 
> I'd rather not, too. That's why I haven't committed anything.

Well, boundp and fboundp can be called from C as well, so if you can
find something that we could test for bound-ness, that will do the
trick.

(I'm traveling and don't have easy access to sources nor enough time
to look myself, sorry.)