[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done? |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:45:08 -0800 (PST) |
Karl Fogel <address@hidden> writes:
> [repost -- sorry, I accidentally put this in another thread before]
>
> We've been planning to switch to bzr, but haven't really done so yet.
> What's still blocking this?
>
> I'll serve as a conduit/organizer in bringing the reasons to bzr
> developers, if necessary. (It's related to my work anyway.)
Here's another one:
Assume that bar and baz are registered under bzr, foo is not.
Running the command below (-v -S is what emacs uses for the vc-dir
command):
bzr status -v -S foo bar baz
results in:
bzr: ERROR: Path(s) do not exist: foo
nothing is shown about the other 2 files.
this can occur in practice when using vc-dir, when removing an
unregistered file, and then doing a refresh.
Reference for this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/306394
Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Karl Fogel, 2008/12/11
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Karl Fogel, 2008/12/17
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Tassilo Horn, 2008/12/18
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Karl Fogel, 2008/12/18
- Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Tassilo Horn, 2008/12/19
Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Giorgos Keramidas, 2008/12/19
Re: Switching to bzr: what remains to be done?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/12/18