[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release plans
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Release plans |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:14:16 +0900 |
Richard M. Stallman writes:
> I grant the conceptual possibility that you assert, but I deny
> its importance. I claim it is both extremely unlikely to come
> to pass, and that we can deal with the process of it arising in
> other ways.
> No one can tell for certain. The only relevant fact is that the problem
> scenario did indeed occur for Linux.
Linus invited binary modules, and eventually found it was a bad
thing. You would not make that mistake; I don't think the
scenarios are the same.
> Whether it would happen with Emacs, none of us can determine.
That is true.
> I have decided not to take the risk.
That's a shame for Emacs, and for the free software community, in my
opinion.
- Re: Release plans, (continued)
- Re: Release plans, Sean Sieger, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, tomas, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, tomas, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, tomas, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Paul R, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/19
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/16
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Johannes Weiner, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/17
- Re: Release plans, Johannes Weiner, 2008/08/17