[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?
From: |
Romain Francoise |
Subject: |
Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this? |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:02:07 +0200 |
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> I can set mine up on Ubuntu 6.x and 7.x and MacOS X. [...] I'll
> do --with-ns, --without-x, and --with-x on MacOS X and just the
> latter two on the Ubuntu systems.
There seems to be some confusion here: are you proposing to set up a
new master instance, or to provide build slaves for my master?
If the former, your buildbot will live at a separate URLs, which may
not be ideal.
If the latter, the commands are defined by the master and you don't
need any config file.
Actually, now that I think about it, we should probably redo the
configuration from scratch and have separate masters for the trunk
and the 22 branch, as Python does...
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, (continued)
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/01
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/02
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/04
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/04
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/05
- buildbots (was: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?), Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/05
- buildbots (was: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/08/05
- place to send build failure reports? (was: buildbots), Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/08
- Re: place to send build failure reports?, Chong Yidong, 2008/08/08
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?,
Romain Francoise <=
- Re: eshell-defgroup. Do we really need this?, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/08/04