[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:21:55 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
>> I don't know how many people actually want them in visual-line-mode
>> (I'd like a fringe item at a hard newline, but until this is
>> implemented the next best thing is a display-table element for \n).
> We could leave the continuation glyphs, but make them less conspicuous.
For a mode that expects most lines to be wrapped, I see not point in
leaving continuation marks.
> To mark hard newlines, try the code below. I suggest to include this.
> ;; 2230 = \x8B6
> (defvar show-newlines-newline-code (vector (make-glyph-code 2230
> blank-newline) 10))
[ Too long a line, huh? ]
My font doesn't seem to know the char 2230, and UnicodeData.txt doesn't
seem to know that char either. So we should probably use something else.
> (if show-newlines-mode
> (aset buffer-display-table 10 show-newlines-newline-code)
> (aset buffer-display-table 10 nil)))
Better write it as:
(aset buffer-display-table 10
(if show-newlines-mode show-newlines-newline-code))
-- Stefan
- line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, T. V. Raman, 2008/07/16
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/16
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, David Reitter, 2008/07/16
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Chong Yidong, 2008/07/16
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Chong Yidong, 2008/07/16
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Chong Yidong, 2008/07/17
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Miles Bader, 2008/07/18
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/18
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, David Reitter, 2008/07/18
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/07/18
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/18
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Miles Bader, 2008/07/18
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, David Reitter, 2008/07/21
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Chong Yidong, 2008/07/21
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, David Reitter, 2008/07/21
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Miles Bader, 2008/07/21
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Stefan Monnier, 2008/07/21
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Miles Bader, 2008/07/21
- Re: line-line-move-visual: was line motion problem, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/07/21