[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Display-based word wrapping
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Display-based word wrapping |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:58:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
> What I'm questioning is whether it's truly a 3-state situation. From
> the point of view of the redisplay engine, yes, it's just three
> different ways of wrapping. But from the point of view of the Lisp
> interface, it may be more convenient to regard word-wrap and char-wrap
> are two different styles of line continuation, and to draw an additional
> distinction between line continuation and line truncation. Because then
> the semantic role of truncate-partial-width-windows and
> toggle-truncate-lines would be unchanged: if lines are not truncated,
> they are continued, and the word-wrap variable determines how that
> continuation occurs.
Yes, I guess that makes sense as well,
Stefan
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, (continued)
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Miles Bader, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/25
- Re: Display-based word wrapping,
Stefan Monnier <=