[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: newsticker-*.el files
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: newsticker-*.el files |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:12:06 +0300 |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Cc: Leo <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:23:02 +0900
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > Not that I see how this is relevant: all I'm asking is not break it
> > more than it is already broken, so that the efforts to revive it won't
> > be harder than they have to. The cost of this request is so low that
> > I'm bewildered why I need to justify it each time.
>
> I think the perception is that the benefit is less than the cost,
> even if the latter is "low".
I submit that with a sufficiently low cost, the benefits are
irrelevant.
- newsticker-*.el files, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/08
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, Leo, 2008/06/08
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/06/09
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, Miles Bader, 2008/06/09
- Re: newsticker-*.el files,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, David Kastrup, 2008/06/09
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/06/09
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/09
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, Miles Bader, 2008/06/09
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, dhruva, 2008/06/09
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/10
- Re: newsticker-*.el files, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/09
Re: newsticker-*.el files, Miles Bader, 2008/06/08
Re: newsticker-*.el files, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/08