Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs

[Dan Nicolaescu]

Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:

  >  > > In that case, do you think [it was] premature to remove vc-directory 
which
  >  > > was better at doing some of the things vc-dir should do?
  >  > 
  >  > AFAIK, it has the same "commit in foreground" and "no way to update the
  >  > whole direcrory" problem.  VC-dir is missing some features, but which
  >  > ones (other than the obvious ones from dired which probably won't be
  >  > added to vc-dir anyway) were present in vc-dired?
  > 
  >  vc-dir isn't documented (but vc-directory is)...

Actually, ESR updated the documentation a few weeks ago.