[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
vc-status vs pcl-cvs
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
vc-status vs pcl-cvs |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:39:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to switch from pcl-cvs to vc-status to use the same
interface for cvs and hg.
I have the following problems though:
1. commit is in foreground, not background.
2. there is no way to update the whole directory (O in pcl-cvs runs
cvs-mode-update which runs "cvs up" on the selection or the whole
directory).
3. lines like "DIRECTORY ./" - what are they for? how do I
get rid of them?
thanks!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIRbogPp1Qsf2qnMcRAtB5AJ9kUpk3mwxdCgslL6unfeBJH1N4DQCeOy34
Mpgoczi/bye33ANyfHR9K2M=
=A9JA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- vc-status vs pcl-cvs,
Sam Steingold <=
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/05