[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: face-remapping patch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: face-remapping patch |
Date: |
Wed, 28 May 2008 17:05:12 +0900 |
BTW, one reason for why a remapping alist is so nice is that it
leverages Emacs' existing infrastructure well. In particular, the
user-related parts like face customization are built around global named
faces (even frame-specific faces are not handled well [at all?] by
this).
When a major mode to remaps `default' to `my-mode-default', existing
mechanisms can be used to handle things like user-customization of
`my-mode-default'.
-Miles
--
Virtues, n. pl. Certain abstentions.
- face-remapping patch, Miles Bader, 2008/05/26
- Re: face-remapping patch, Florian Beck, 2008/05/27
- Re: face-remapping patch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/27
- Re: face-remapping patch, Miles Bader, 2008/05/27
- Re: face-remapping patch, David Reitter, 2008/05/28
- Re: face-remapping patch, Miles Bader, 2008/05/28
- Re: face-remapping patch,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: face-remapping patch, David Kastrup, 2008/05/28
- Re: face-remapping patch, Miles Bader, 2008/05/28
- Re: face-remapping patch, David Kastrup, 2008/05/28
- Re: face-remapping patch, David Reitter, 2008/05/28
- Re: face-remapping patch, Miles Bader, 2008/05/28
- Re: face-remapping patch, David Reitter, 2008/05/28
- Face realization (was: face-remapping patch), Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/28
- Re: Face realization (was: face-remapping patch), David Reitter, 2008/05/28
- Re: Face realization, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/29
- Re: face-remapping patch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/28