[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; wrong glyph widths of some Unicode codepoints
From: |
Torsten Bronger |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; wrong glyph widths of some Unicode codepoints |
Date: |
Fri, 23 May 2008 09:00:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Hallöchen!
Kenichi Handa writes:
> In article <address@hidden>, Torsten Bronger
> <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> The sub/superscripts (e.g. ⁴ or ₃) are narrower than the ordinary
>> characters if using a monospace font (monospace-13 in my case),
>> with the exceptions of ¹²³. The same is true at least for the
>> prime character ′. The right arrow → and the cubic root ∛ used
>> to have a "correct" width, but with the recent Emacs, it is too
>> wide (the cubic root even too tall, too).
>
> Please type C-u C-x = on normal ascii characters and those
> problematic characters and check which fonts are used.
Unfortunately, another issue with the current CVS version was a
blocker for my particular case, so I switched back to an older
version a couple of minutes ago. Hmpf. My current Emacs version
(which displays the sub- and superscripts with correct widths) says
dejavu sans
mono:pixelsize=17:foundry=unknown:weight=regular:slant=normal:width=normal
(#x6A6)
> By the way, are you sure that your monospace-13 font has glyphs
> for all of them. In my environtment, monospace font is actually
> mapped to "bitstream vera sans mono" and that font doesn't have
> glyphs for those characters.
It's the same here. However, the sub/superscripts used to work
until recently, see above.
> In such a situation, it's difficult to expect to see them with the
> same metrics as others.
If the adjustment of glyphs from different fonts is not feasible, I
must and can live with it. But it's certainly a useful thing to
have in my opinion.
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
Jabber ID: address@hidden
(See http://ime.webhop.org for further contact info.)