[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs"
From: |
Richard M Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs" |
Date: |
Sat, 03 May 2008 04:09:28 -0400 |
The way I see it, multithreading within a buffer is a problem we can
ignore for the next 20 years.
I am not sure of that. In multi-terminal use it is very likely that
more than one terminal will be operating in the same buffer.
With cooperative multithreading, it will be easy to avoid
changing Lisp threads in the middle of any operation that changes
the buffer contents, So I don't think operating in the same buffer
will be any problem at all.
- Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs", Jonathan Rockway, 2008/05/01
- Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs", David Hansen, 2008/05/01
- Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs", Miles Bader, 2008/05/01
- Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs", Jonathan Rockway, 2008/05/01
- Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs", Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/02
- CEDET and threads (was Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs"), Eric M. Ludlam, 2008/05/02
- Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs",
Richard M Stallman <=
- Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs", Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/03
- Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs", Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/04
- buffer transactions (was Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs"), Nic, 2008/05/04
- Re: buffer transactions (was Re: Very interesting analysis of "the state of Emacs"), Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/05